I simply don't get it

as below, we know Wes and Naismith doesn't work, and we know of the two, Wes is by some distance the better Number Ten(tm).

Is it really so much of a stretch that we might start Wes+Maddison, combined with Pritchard or Canos or a Murphy, as that line of three? I don't think it is, and I'd really have liked to see us give it a go at some point.

I guess Mads will learn a bit and bulk up a little at ABZ but I can't help wondering if it's really necessary for him and wise for us. Certainly Naismith is a busted flush.

Posted By: Old Man on August 31st 2016 at 22:53:23

Message Thread

Maddison was one of the most promising players I've seen play for us for a while. (NCFC) - APB, Aug 31, 22:48:24
- Really promising player (NCFC) - norway, Aug 31, 22:55:35
  - There should only be Wes ahead of him for 10 role (n/m) (NCFC) - bjg123, Aug 31, 23:06:08
  - so Aberdeen's set-up is better than ours for development? (NCFC) - CWC, Aug 31, 23:05:40
- It's fucked my goat right up. (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Aug 31, 22:53:38
  - Steven Whittaker? (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Aug 31, 22:54:32
- I simply don't get it (NCFC) - Old Man, Aug 31, 22:53:23
  - It's Neil being stubborn again. He had to be seen to be using his expensive player (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Aug 31, 22:54:49
    - He tried to offload him though, didn't he? Deal fell through due to personal terms (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Aug 31, 22:55:57
- Really deflating to realise the manager doesn't rate him, makes me question Neil's whole (NCFC) - Old Git, Aug 31, 22:51:22
- Me too (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Aug 31, 22:49:32

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.