But you are admonishing me a little for my response to the article, no?
which is fine! But my irritated reaction is just part of the debate I hope.
However I wouldn't want to blur the distinction between the article itself and your presentation of it as a discussion. I accept the logic and benefit of provocation and free speech as a way to properly consider issues. I just thought his argument was deeply flawed.
But I'm glad you posted it and, as I said, I found the discussion interesting.
Posted By: norway on August 18th 2016 at 23:47:18
Message Thread
- Attn Norway / Judge (General Chat) - APB, Aug 18, 22:32:01
- Mine's the. (n/m) (General Chat) - Garry Brooke, Aug 19, 00:00:50
- Gorgeous city. Grew up there but moved long ago. (General Chat) - SeattleSounders, Aug 18, 23:50:31
- Sadly, any opinion piece from either the grauniad or the daily wotsit (General Chat) - shoddy, Aug 18, 23:09:22
- I'm not sure I know what to say (General Chat) - norway, Aug 18, 23:03:01
- I didn't say what you said wasn't valid. (General Chat) - APB, Aug 18, 23:25:38
- But you are admonishing me a little for my response to the article, no? (General Chat) - norway, Aug 18, 23:47:18
- No admonishment intended. (General Chat) - APB, Aug 19, 00:19:31
- I didn't see it like that.. but I do take your broader point. (n/m) (General Chat) - norway, Aug 19, 07:54:09
- No admonishment intended. (General Chat) - APB, Aug 19, 00:19:31
- But you are admonishing me a little for my response to the article, no? (General Chat) - norway, Aug 18, 23:47:18
- I didn't say what you said wasn't valid. (General Chat) - APB, Aug 18, 23:25:38
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.