well they might not appoint him officially until the end of the season
but having committed to it he would probably feel uncomfortable about still being employed here.
Posted By: mr carra on May 10th 2016 at 13:29:02
Message Thread
- Ed Balls interview (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 11:55:46
- What did hh he say? (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, May 10, 11:56:36
- Ed Balls (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Breadstick, May 10, 12:17:59
- Absolutely nothing... (NCFC) - Brom, May 10, 11:58:02
- I'm actually beginning to wonder if he's been headhunted by another club (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:00:22
- Villa must be in the market (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, May 10, 12:08:06
- Yeah. although that basket case of a club can't seem appealing, surely? (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:11:00
- You say that, but? (NCFC) - Sellbydave, May 10, 12:15:59
- Ref Lerner selling (NCFC) - CWC, May 10, 12:23:07
- Yes, that's true. We wouldn't have looked appealing. (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:17:32
- If it was a simple headhunting/fancy a change whatever (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:35:47
- well they might not appoint him officially until the end of the season (NCFC) - mr carra, May 10, 13:29:02
- Why? would it not suit his new club to be sooner? (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:41:31
- If it was a simple headhunting/fancy a change whatever (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:35:47
- You say that, but? (NCFC) - Sellbydave, May 10, 12:15:59
- Yeah. although that basket case of a club can't seem appealing, surely? (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:11:00
- More like he was backed into a corner after drunk in charge of his twatter account. (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:07:27
- board wouldn't have got rid of him just for that (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:10:04
- Well, he said he'd resign caused a minor shit storm... (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:26:55
- I don't think he backtracked at all (NCFC) - mr carra, May 10, 13:22:46
- I agree. Would be a tad hypocritical of Delia to sack someone for being publicly drunk (NCFC) - Old Man, May 10, 12:12:06
- A more innocent time then though, wasn't it (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, May 10, 12:16:17
- You don't sack someone you want to keep, just for that (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:18:25
- then we ultimately didn't want to keep him did we, and he simply hastened his exit. (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, May 10, 12:22:05
- We don't know (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:24:01
- Yes really. They accepted his resignation. (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:30:23
- You're assuming he resigned over the twitter stuff (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:40:05
- So you think if Twittergate didn't happen, he still would've walked Monday? (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:54:59
- surely Twittergate happened precisely because he intended to resign? (NCFC) - mr carra, May 10, 13:03:50
- That's what I thought (NCFC) - KentonCanary, May 10, 13:15:02
- surely the only reason for the 'storm'... (NCFC) - mr carra, May 10, 13:19:24
- Too much sensible thought. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 10, 13:05:21
- Exactly. (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 13:05:18
- That's what I thought (NCFC) - KentonCanary, May 10, 13:15:02
- I don't know the reason (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 13:02:56
- surely Twittergate happened precisely because he intended to resign? (NCFC) - mr carra, May 10, 13:03:50
- So you think if Twittergate didn't happen, he still would've walked Monday? (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:54:59
- You're assuming he resigned over the twitter stuff (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:40:05
- Yes really. They accepted his resignation. (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:30:23
- We don't know (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:24:01
- then we ultimately didn't want to keep him did we, and he simply hastened his exit. (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, May 10, 12:22:05
- You don't sack someone you want to keep, just for that (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:18:25
- A more innocent time then though, wasn't it (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, May 10, 12:16:17
- Well, he said he'd resign caused a minor shit storm... (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:26:55
- board wouldn't have got rid of him just for that (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:10:04
- Villa must be in the market (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, May 10, 12:08:06
- The politician in him (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, May 10, 11:58:54
- Yes... (NCFC) - Brom, May 10, 12:00:12
- He's got a speech defect (NCFC) - Jambocanary, May 10, 12:02:16
- Yes he has (NCFC) - Old Git, May 10, 12:36:29
- Smashed home after great setup play (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, May 10, 13:07:15
- guilty heh (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, May 10, 12:39:08
- Then I apologise... (NCFC) - Brom, May 10, 12:04:11
- Yes he has (NCFC) - Old Git, May 10, 12:36:29
- He's got a speech defect (NCFC) - Jambocanary, May 10, 12:02:16
- Yes... (NCFC) - Brom, May 10, 12:00:12
- I'm actually beginning to wonder if he's been headhunted by another club (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:00:22
- What did hh he say? (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, May 10, 11:56:36
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.