I don't think he backtracked at all
It was just that the club wanted to announce it officially themselves (as they did yesterday), so in the meantime he had to try and pretend his tweet wasn't true. He was already committed to resigning when he made the tweet.
Posted By: mr carra on May 10th 2016 at 13:22:46
Message Thread
- Ed Balls interview (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 11:55:46
- What did hh he say? (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, May 10, 11:56:36
- Ed Balls (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Breadstick, May 10, 12:17:59
- Absolutely nothing... (NCFC) - Brom, May 10, 11:58:02
- I'm actually beginning to wonder if he's been headhunted by another club (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:00:22
- Villa must be in the market (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, May 10, 12:08:06
- Yeah. although that basket case of a club can't seem appealing, surely? (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:11:00
- You say that, but? (NCFC) - Sellbydave, May 10, 12:15:59
- Ref Lerner selling (NCFC) - CWC, May 10, 12:23:07
- Yes, that's true. We wouldn't have looked appealing. (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:17:32
- If it was a simple headhunting/fancy a change whatever (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:35:47
- well they might not appoint him officially until the end of the season (NCFC) - mr carra, May 10, 13:29:02
- Why? would it not suit his new club to be sooner? (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:41:31
- If it was a simple headhunting/fancy a change whatever (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:35:47
- You say that, but? (NCFC) - Sellbydave, May 10, 12:15:59
- Yeah. although that basket case of a club can't seem appealing, surely? (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:11:00
- More like he was backed into a corner after drunk in charge of his twatter account. (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:07:27
- board wouldn't have got rid of him just for that (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:10:04
- Well, he said he'd resign caused a minor shit storm... (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:26:55
- I don't think he backtracked at all (NCFC) - mr carra, May 10, 13:22:46
- I agree. Would be a tad hypocritical of Delia to sack someone for being publicly drunk (NCFC) - Old Man, May 10, 12:12:06
- A more innocent time then though, wasn't it (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, May 10, 12:16:17
- You don't sack someone you want to keep, just for that (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:18:25
- then we ultimately didn't want to keep him did we, and he simply hastened his exit. (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, May 10, 12:22:05
- We don't know (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:24:01
- Yes really. They accepted his resignation. (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:30:23
- You're assuming he resigned over the twitter stuff (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:40:05
- So you think if Twittergate didn't happen, he still would've walked Monday? (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:54:59
- surely Twittergate happened precisely because he intended to resign? (NCFC) - mr carra, May 10, 13:03:50
- That's what I thought (NCFC) - KentonCanary, May 10, 13:15:02
- surely the only reason for the 'storm'... (NCFC) - mr carra, May 10, 13:19:24
- Too much sensible thought. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 10, 13:05:21
- Exactly. (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 13:05:18
- That's what I thought (NCFC) - KentonCanary, May 10, 13:15:02
- I don't know the reason (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 13:02:56
- surely Twittergate happened precisely because he intended to resign? (NCFC) - mr carra, May 10, 13:03:50
- So you think if Twittergate didn't happen, he still would've walked Monday? (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:54:59
- You're assuming he resigned over the twitter stuff (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:40:05
- Yes really. They accepted his resignation. (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:30:23
- We don't know (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:24:01
- then we ultimately didn't want to keep him did we, and he simply hastened his exit. (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, May 10, 12:22:05
- You don't sack someone you want to keep, just for that (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:18:25
- A more innocent time then though, wasn't it (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, May 10, 12:16:17
- Well, he said he'd resign caused a minor shit storm... (NCFC) - harry boulders, May 10, 12:26:55
- board wouldn't have got rid of him just for that (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:10:04
- Villa must be in the market (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, May 10, 12:08:06
- The politician in him (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, May 10, 11:58:54
- Yes... (NCFC) - Brom, May 10, 12:00:12
- He's got a speech defect (NCFC) - Jambocanary, May 10, 12:02:16
- Yes he has (NCFC) - Old Git, May 10, 12:36:29
- Smashed home after great setup play (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, May 10, 13:07:15
- guilty heh (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, May 10, 12:39:08
- Then I apologise... (NCFC) - Brom, May 10, 12:04:11
- Yes he has (NCFC) - Old Git, May 10, 12:36:29
- He's got a speech defect (NCFC) - Jambocanary, May 10, 12:02:16
- Yes... (NCFC) - Brom, May 10, 12:00:12
- I'm actually beginning to wonder if he's been headhunted by another club (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 10, 12:00:22
- What did hh he say? (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, May 10, 11:56:36
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.