In absolute terms this one is
But as the league spending has gone up and the overall standard got stronger I would say this one is probably no better, if not worse, in relation to the rest of the league (which is of course the only comparison that affects where you actually finish)
I think if you put this squad in the 2013/14 Premier League it would have a notably better chance of staying up
Posted By: mr carra on April 17th 2016 at 13:08:00
Message Thread
- Last seasons strike force vs this seasons (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Apr 17, 12:50:04
- i do agree, especially regarding hooper (NCFC) - Bonjour, Apr 17, 12:56:18
- Bamford needs another chance but to be told in no uncertain terms, fuck it up (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Apr 17, 13:05:58
- Bamford plays better with Wes in the team. Keep the ball on the floor (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Apr 17, 13:17:29
- Bamford needs another chance but to be told in no uncertain terms, fuck it up (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Apr 17, 13:05:58
- Another question. Which squad is the stronger? This one or Hughtons? (NCFC) - Dirty Delia, Apr 17, 12:55:42
- In absolute terms this one is (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 17, 13:08:00
- this one without a doubt (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 17, 12:57:57
- I know your post is backed by a ridiculous agenda (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Apr 17, 13:07:51
- we got rid of Grabban and Hooper because neither are good enough (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 17, 12:54:10
- Agreed plus we didn't replace like with like (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Apr 17, 13:11:05
- yeah, I remember there were strong rumours of us going for Gayle, (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 17, 13:27:26
- Agreed plus we didn't replace like with like (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Apr 17, 13:11:05
- i do agree, especially regarding hooper (NCFC) - Bonjour, Apr 17, 12:56:18
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.