+1 for Vadis
I don't understand why he's dropped out of the picture the way he has.
Posted By: King on April 16th 2016 at 17:48:06
Message Thread
- Banging the same drum BUT fuck me it's not rocket science to know Wes must start. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Apr 16, 17:20:43
- Hardly set the world on fire when he came on (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Apr 16, 17:49:23
- The little passage of play towards the end where wes passed (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Apr 16, 18:15:36
- He changed it from long ball shit to tippy tappy shit (NCFC) - mr carra, Apr 16, 17:55:23
- He was proper shit (n/m) (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Apr 16, 18:46:02
- Tippy tappy shit?? Really? Have a word..Wes is our best player FFS. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Apr 16, 18:42:45
- I agree (NCFC) - Winged Eel Creosote, Apr 16, 17:27:01
- Lol really? (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Apr 16, 17:29:56
- well no he didn't but I would pick Hoolahan ahead of Naismith who (NCFC) - lovely old job, Apr 16, 17:32:55
- I would probably pick Vadis ahead of Naismith. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, Apr 16, 17:44:45
- +1 for Vadis (NCFC) - King, Apr 16, 17:48:06
- Dorrans gets on the bench ahead of him as well. Don't see what Dorrans brings. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, Apr 16, 17:52:57
- +1 for Vadis (NCFC) - King, Apr 16, 17:48:06
- I would probably pick Vadis ahead of Naismith. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, Apr 16, 17:44:45
- What do you think? (n/m) (NCFC) - Winged Eel Creosote, Apr 16, 17:31:30
- Well at least he can control a fucking football... (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Apr 16, 17:33:28
- Passes it well and creates also. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, Apr 16, 17:54:06
- it feels as if Naismith doesn't really want to be here, when he was subbed I have (NCFC) - lovely old job, Apr 16, 17:34:43
- he actually looked a bit disappointed then realised he should get off quickly (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Apr 16, 17:42:58
- Well at least he can control a fucking football... (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Apr 16, 17:33:28
- well no he didn't but I would pick Hoolahan ahead of Naismith who (NCFC) - lovely old job, Apr 16, 17:32:55
- Lol really? (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Apr 16, 17:29:56
- It was a calculated gamble I guess (NCFC) - King, Apr 16, 17:24:22
- You winding me up? Picking a player not based on form but cos he once scored a hat trick? (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Apr 16, 17:31:19
- No, I'm not winding you up (NCFC) - King, Apr 16, 17:34:53
- You winding me up? Picking a player not based on form but cos he once scored a hat trick? (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Apr 16, 17:31:19
- Hardly set the world on fire when he came on (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Apr 16, 17:49:23
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.