if they'd hammered us, it would have been given a nice 7 or 8
because that's what the journos like to see, their faves thrashing the s**tty lambs who ought not to have the temerity to defend
Posted By: paulg on March 14th 2016 at 12:32:43
Message Thread
- yesterdays match report from the Independent. (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Mar 14, 10:22:33
- But how else could he show off his Calvin Kleins? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Mar 14, 10:49:26
- Match rating 3/10? (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Mar 14, 10:27:29
- if they'd hammered us, it would have been given a nice 7 or 8 (NCFC) - paulg, Mar 14, 12:32:43
- Yes, and that is generous (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 14, 10:50:11
- rubbish - it was a cracking 0.0 - I really enjoyed it 7/10 from me (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Mar 14, 11:39:08
- It was worth a 7/10 for the spinny hands thing alone (n/m) (NCFC) - NorwichDave, Mar 14, 11:41:09
- exactly - and we got a free carrier bag, no pleasing some people (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Mar 14, 11:42:24
- It would have been 10/10 if Dorrans would have banged in his last minute chance. (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Mar 14, 13:14:21
- exactly - and we got a free carrier bag, no pleasing some people (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Mar 14, 11:42:24
- It was worth a 7/10 for the spinny hands thing alone (n/m) (NCFC) - NorwichDave, Mar 14, 11:41:09
- rubbish - it was a cracking 0.0 - I really enjoyed it 7/10 from me (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Mar 14, 11:39:08
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.