Well said Jim
Posted By: happy clappy hughes on March 10th 2016 at 09:40:29
Message Thread
- ?1,137,000.00 - reasons that McNally should go - shocking !! (n/m) (NCFC) - Shut the gate, Mar 10, 08:22:48
- But we can't compete because we don't have a sugar daddy owner (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, Mar 10, 08:45:56
- I don't like the salary he gets but I also don't like players salaries (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Mar 10, 10:24:10
- CEOs are a very great deal cheaper than players (NCFC) - Old Git, Mar 10, 09:05:57
- When you factor in bonus and other benefits (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, Mar 10, 09:30:46
- they are because you only have one (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 10, 09:35:00
- No shit Sherlock (n/m) (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, Mar 10, 09:39:13
- they are because you only have one (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 10, 09:35:00
- Not that much cheaper at ?20k-30K a week! (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 10, 09:14:33
- Come off it Jim (NCFC) - Old Git, Mar 10, 09:30:27
- Nail. Head. Peanuts in the scheme of things. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Mar 10, 10:20:29
- I'd rather have a board that kept us in the premier league. Funnily enough, that tends (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 10, 09:43:07
- But CEO's don't have a resale value players do hopefully (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, Mar 10, 09:37:37
- "hitting financial targets" is what we stop us getting in the mess of 2009 (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 10, 09:26:01
- I don;t have a problem with paying a bonus for avoiding relegation, thats how it should be (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 10, 09:33:38
- do we know that he doesn't? (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 10, 09:37:09
- I'm sure he does. If you look at the accounts in 2012/2013 and then (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 10, 09:47:03
- so what's your problem? (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 10, 09:56:07
- When you factor in bonus and other benefits (n/m) (NCFC) - the Tilt Man, Apr 1, 19:27:51
- My problem is that, in the season we got relegated from the premier league (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 10, 10:15:08
- he got a bonus for ensuring we weren't in financial sh*t when we got relegated (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 10, 10:32:29
- Any staying up bonus should be conditional upon non reckless financial spending (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 10, 10:40:32
- Very well put Jim. It was his 'relegation would be worse than death' period (NCFC) - pab, Mar 10, 10:26:17
- he got a bonus for ensuring we weren't in financial sh*t when we got relegated (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 10, 10:32:29
- so what's your problem? (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 10, 09:56:07
- I'm sure he does. If you look at the accounts in 2012/2013 and then (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 10, 09:47:03
- do we know that he doesn't? (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 10, 09:37:09
- *will* stop us (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 10, 09:26:28
- I don;t have a problem with paying a bonus for avoiding relegation, thats how it should be (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 10, 09:33:38
- Let's get Doncaster back, he was cheaper and just as successful.... (NCFC) - Brom, Mar 10, 09:20:55
- Typical wrath black/white reaction rather than discussing the point (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 10, 09:25:15
- Because in all walks of life, if you don't pay enough, you get the right people in. (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Mar 10, 09:49:03
- Well said Jim (n/m) (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, Mar 10, 09:40:29
- It just seems really childish to me. (NCFC) - lurd, Mar 10, 09:30:24
- Weird, isn't it? I really don't give the tiniest shit about what McNally's paid. (NCFC) - bird table, Mar 10, 09:54:17
- I give a shit (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 10, 09:58:42
- Who did more to get us financial stable? (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, Mar 10, 09:49:50
- Just miserablists and ... (NCFC) - loz, Mar 10, 09:33:24
- Probably a bit of jealousy too (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Mar 10, 09:35:21
- Indeed. Was going to say that.. (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Mar 10, 09:36:25
- seems absolutely staggering to be having a go at McNally (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 10, 09:41:26
- Yep, so easy to forget we were in the 3rd division and the brink of administration when (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Mar 10, 09:52:39
- seems absolutely staggering to be having a go at McNally (NCFC) - mr carra, Mar 10, 09:41:26
- Indeed. Was going to say that.. (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Mar 10, 09:36:25
- Probably a bit of jealousy too (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Mar 10, 09:35:21
- Weird, isn't it? I really don't give the tiniest shit about what McNally's paid. (NCFC) - bird table, Mar 10, 09:54:17
- Get over it. (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Mar 10, 09:27:22
- Typical wrath black/white reaction rather than discussing the point (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 10, 09:25:15
- Come off it Jim (NCFC) - Old Git, Mar 10, 09:30:27
- I don't get why people are so obsessed with our CEO's wages. (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Mar 10, 09:11:35
- Becuase they're always looking for someone to blame for everything, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Mar 10, 09:20:13
- Probably because its clearly a very, very good package he's on and so when the team is (NCFC) - Jim, Mar 10, 09:19:58
- When you factor in bonus and other benefits (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, Mar 10, 09:30:46
- But we can't compete because we don't have a sugar daddy owner (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, Mar 10, 08:45:56
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.