I think some of it is due to him. He's too immobile, while has great movement
and gives us a much better outlet since he's faster and far more difficult to mark.
Mbok seems to be marked out of it and constantly with his back to goal and it makes it impossible for us to push out
Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on February 27th 2016 at 17:31:33
Message Thread
- Surely Bamford better than Jerome? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Feb 27, 17:07:16
- The same 11 but Mbokani instead of Jerome. Redmond is capable of goals, given the right (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Feb 27, 17:11:36
- we've undeniably played much better with Jermone than with Mbok (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 27, 17:15:11
- Not down to Mbokani though, more down to defence frailty (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Feb 27, 17:25:34
- I think some of it is due to him. He's too immobile, while has great movement (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 27, 17:31:33
- *while CJ has great movement (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 27, 17:32:11
- I think some of it is due to him. He's too immobile, while has great movement (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 27, 17:31:33
- vmt - Jerome offers almost everything apart from scoring (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 27, 17:21:20
- i think mbok would be awesome in the chums. (n/m) (NCFC) - brianguthrysluvchild, Feb 27, 17:19:09
- chumps i meant (n/m) (NCFC) - brianguthrysluvchild, Feb 27, 17:19:28
- Not down to Mbokani though, more down to defence frailty (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Feb 27, 17:25:34
- we've undeniably played much better with Jermone than with Mbok (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 27, 17:15:11
- The same 11 but Mbokani instead of Jerome. Redmond is capable of goals, given the right (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Feb 27, 17:11:36
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.