i think mbok would be awesome in the chums.
Posted By: brianguthrysluvchild on February 27th 2016 at 17:19:09
Message Thread
- Surely Bamford better than Jerome? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Feb 27, 17:07:16
- The same 11 but Mbokani instead of Jerome. Redmond is capable of goals, given the right (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Feb 27, 17:11:36
- we've undeniably played much better with Jermone than with Mbok (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 27, 17:15:11
- Not down to Mbokani though, more down to defence frailty (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Feb 27, 17:25:34
- I think some of it is due to him. He's too immobile, while has great movement (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 27, 17:31:33
- *while CJ has great movement (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 27, 17:32:11
- I think some of it is due to him. He's too immobile, while has great movement (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 27, 17:31:33
- vmt - Jerome offers almost everything apart from scoring (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 27, 17:21:20
- i think mbok would be awesome in the chums. (n/m) (NCFC) - brianguthrysluvchild, Feb 27, 17:19:09
- chumps i meant (n/m) (NCFC) - brianguthrysluvchild, Feb 27, 17:19:28
- Not down to Mbokani though, more down to defence frailty (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Feb 27, 17:25:34
- we've undeniably played much better with Jermone than with Mbok (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 27, 17:15:11
- The same 11 but Mbokani instead of Jerome. Redmond is capable of goals, given the right (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Feb 27, 17:11:36
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.