He was excellent, and we didn't respond to him and Carroll coming on

It was fairly obvious how they'd play with those two on the pitch, and I'd have hoped for a reshuffling to try to deal with it. It's entirely possible that we could have reshuffled and exactly the same thing would have happened - we simply don't know. You're right that Moses in particular would have given us problems to deal with no matter how we set up.

Posted By: Old Man on February 14th 2016 at 12:10:51

Message Thread

I thought Howson was brill yesterday. (n/m) (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 14, 10:52:46
- He's an attacking player and does so much better going forward than sitting back (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 14, 11:30:29
  - vmt - his best role is at the front of a midfield three / just behind the striker (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 14, 11:36:45
- I thought, aside from those annoying two moments... (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Feb 14, 11:23:42
  - We were certainly Good Enough for 70 mins (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 14, 11:31:47
    - I've read a lot a criticism about our players but did no one notice how good Moses was (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Feb 14, 12:04:09
      - He was excellent, and we didn't respond to him and Carroll coming on (NCFC) - Old Man, Feb 14, 12:10:51
        
        Moses seemed particularly good and I said to the guy next to me... (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Feb 14, 12:31:38
- he was immense (n/m) (NCFC) - Taxi 4 Johnson, Feb 14, 11:10:10
- Some clown posted earlier that he was our big problem! (NCFC) - Fozzybear, Feb 14, 11:04:00
  - He was good in many ways it he did lose his man for both goals (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 14, 11:09:48
  - Been our best player last few games...bit worryingly he was last time we went down! (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 14, 11:08:57

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.