which is less of a threat than getting to the by-line and putting crosses in
or cutting the ball back.
Hoofing the ball to Carroll was what we should have forced them into doing. That is a last resort move by them. Letting them in down our wings was more dangerous.
Posted By: Mecagoenti on February 13th 2016 at 19:18:37
Message Thread
- Naismith for Ollson (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, Feb 13, 19:11:34
- Yes but why Olsson. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Feb 13, 19:41:28
- Brady was absolutely finished too (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 13, 20:46:44
- But he stayed on. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Feb 13, 21:14:27
- Brady was absolutely finished too (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, Feb 13, 20:46:44
- yep, if anything it came too late (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 13, 19:14:52
- The goal (in fact both goals) came down the other side (NCFC) - mr carra, Feb 13, 19:18:28
- perhaps not, but that first goal wouldn't have happened (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 13, 19:19:55
- How and like Neil said, if we would of done that, they would of just lumped long balls up (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 13, 19:16:18
- which is less of a threat than getting to the by-line and putting crosses in (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 13, 19:18:37
- Not true if you read the recent guardian piece about crossing (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Feb 13, 19:27:34
- which is less of a threat than getting to the by-line and putting crosses in (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 13, 19:18:37
- The goal (in fact both goals) came down the other side (NCFC) - mr carra, Feb 13, 19:18:28
- And on a yellow but I would of put Jarvis on (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 13, 19:14:25
- That would have been another option (n/m) (NCFC) - happy clappy hughes, Feb 13, 19:17:20
- Yes but why Olsson. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Feb 13, 19:41:28
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.