Two years ago this week
Mystifying substitutions by Hughton at West Ham when we were well on top and pushing for a win.
In two years time, I think I'll still be wondering how bringing Olsson on for Brady equates to 'not retreating' and allowing West Ham on to us.
Posted By: norway on February 13th 2016 at 18:57:37
Message Thread
- Two years ago this week (NCFC) - norway, Feb 13, 18:57:37
- Naismith and Wes knackered but Jarvis should of come on (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 13, 19:02:24
- Precisely - it was an unfathomable change. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Feb 13, 19:03:55
- I didn't see much wrong with it. Can't win either way atm (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Feb 13, 18:58:45
- But why? What was the point? (NCFC) - norway, Feb 13, 19:01:06
- I would have Put Bamford on ahead of Mbokarni, we seem to have (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Feb 13, 19:37:11
- Olsson (NCFC) - Jester, Feb 13, 19:11:10
- But why? What was the point? (NCFC) - norway, Feb 13, 19:01:06
- Naismith and Wes knackered but Jarvis should of come on (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 13, 19:02:24
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.