I think he's just a central midfielder..6ft plus, strong,decent technically must be
better than at least Mulumbu, who looks as if his legs have gone.
Posted By: BINMEN8R on February 8th 2016 at 11:51:11
Message Thread
- For a Premiership team a midfield of: Mulumbu,Howson & O'Neil is poor and that's (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 8, 11:46:43
- I think Vadis has been poor (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 8, 13:19:58
- Apart from a 20 minute cameo against an average side, Vadis has done nothing. (n/m) (NCFC) - trevor hockeys beard, Feb 8, 12:01:11
- He did that lovely chest down for Howson. (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Feb 8, 12:35:17
- and gave away a very soft penalty (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 8, 16:19:56
- He's better than Mulumbu..who looked out of his depth against the worst side in the league (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 8, 12:03:52
- He did that lovely chest down for Howson. (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Feb 8, 12:35:17
- Apsrt from Vadis playing in a different position he certainly hasn't impressed me (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Feb 8, 11:53:39
- I don't think he plays in a different position..granted he won't hold but (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 8, 12:02:05
- Yep but Vadis is better as a No.10 (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 8, 11:48:26
- I think he's just a central midfielder..6ft plus, strong,decent technically must be (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 8, 11:51:11
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.