Apart from Bennett coming in I'm not sure the starting XI can be significantly improved
Rudd hasn't looked great recently, but Ruddy has been poor for a while now so not sure if his return would change a lot.
Pinto has been woeful defensively, but then the other three options aren't much better. For ?2.2M he was a cheap punt, but really we need true quality that's ready now for that position. I like Naismith a lot, but honestly think that money would have been better spent on genuine quality in one of the full back positions.
Which brings me to Olsson, who played well in possession going forward, but his error at the end possibly shows why Neil doesn't play him and why we need a new left back (one natural LB in the squad isn't enough anyway). Brady will probably go back in at LB, but ideally we need him on the left wing.
Maybe the return of the Tettey/GON partnership would help, but Tettey has stuffed that up for the next two games. Mulumbu showed tonight why he isn't up to the CDM role.
Mbokani is the finisher we need in the box, but lacks the all round game that Jerome has everywhere else on the pitch. I think we look a better team with Jerome playing, but that means we have to rely on others to finish chances created. Bamford is an unknown quantity at this level, but hopefully he has the combined qualities of both the aforementioned to a reasonable level.
Again, having a relatively weak squad with a lack of investment in comparison to others is really our main downfall. Things like GON's red card and the sickness bug shouldn't affect a premier league squad to this degree, but unfortunately they seem to have done so.
Posted By: Common Sense Police on February 2nd 2016 at 22:55:57
Message Thread
- Apart from Bennett coming in I'm not sure the starting XI can be significantly improved (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Feb 2, 22:55:57
- GON has been missed (NCFC) - revsimon, Feb 2, 23:10:00
- Brady left wing, Olsson left back. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Feb 2, 23:07:13
- "Pinto may yet come good" so might RvW...... (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 2, 23:11:57
- Two games. Against top class opposition. Jesus... (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Feb 2, 23:16:11
- Liverpool aren't close to top class (n/m) (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Feb 2, 23:17:34
- Ok... (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Feb 2, 23:26:21
- he was the same b4 he signed for Norwich, not gonna change much (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 2, 23:17:15
- I haven't seen him play before last Saturday. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Feb 2, 23:27:36
- Liverpool aren't close to top class (n/m) (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Feb 2, 23:17:34
- Two games. Against top class opposition. Jesus... (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Feb 2, 23:16:11
- "Pinto may yet come good" so might RvW...... (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 2, 23:11:57
- We've been significantly shit ever since GON got sent off (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 2, 23:03:52
- Don't completely agree (NCFC) - 51eve, Feb 2, 23:03:47
- That's the thing with Redmond though (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Feb 2, 23:08:30
- I'd play Brady and Jarvis on the wings - worked fine at home to Bournemouth (n/m) (NCFC) - Jester, Feb 2, 23:10:24
- People on here moaned when that happened vs Liverpool (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Feb 2, 23:12:29
- But we started that way against Bournemouth (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 2, 23:14:35
- Doesn't change what I'm saying about Bournemouth that day (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Feb 2, 23:17:01
- But we started that way against Bournemouth (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 2, 23:14:35
- People on here moaned when that happened vs Liverpool (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Feb 2, 23:12:29
- I'd play Brady and Jarvis on the wings - worked fine at home to Bournemouth (n/m) (NCFC) - Jester, Feb 2, 23:10:24
- That's the thing with Redmond though (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Feb 2, 23:08:30
- Olssons touch was dog shit .. (NCFC) - Gob on a Stick, Feb 2, 23:02:57
- Olsson was actually pretty good in possession (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Feb 2, 23:04:28
- Wasn't really ollys mistake... Mulumbu I think was messing about with it (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 2, 23:02:03
- Wes has to play that's as certain as it gets (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 2, 22:59:16
- Means dropping Naismith though, surely? (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Feb 2, 23:02:34
- I honestly think you can play them both behind Bamford (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 2, 23:07:19
- Quite a few on here have suggested the lack of doubling up exposed the full backs (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Feb 2, 23:15:00
- Brady left back Wes left Naismith in the middle (n/m) (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 2, 23:06:23
- I honestly think you can play them both behind Bamford (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Feb 2, 23:07:19
- Means dropping Naismith though, surely? (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Feb 2, 23:02:34
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.