He's not a target man but he plays up front and tries to run in behind

From what I recall hence a bit of unease at whether he will suit our style/formation as we tend to need our striker to play the traditional target man role. Gives us a different option though

Posted By: Jim on February 2nd 2016 at 13:29:49

Message Thread

I'm thinking Bamford is more of an attacking midfielder/second striker (NCFC) - scotchcanary, Feb 2, 12:57:04
- I'd like him as one of 3 in behind Mbok i.e. with Wes and Nasmith (NCFC) - Basingstoke_Canary, Feb 2, 13:31:01
  - that relies on Howson being a much better DM than he was against Liverpool (NCFC) - mr carra, Feb 2, 13:37:05
    - Relying on Klose being good so 2 DMs not required. tettey is enough (n/m) (NCFC) - Basingstoke_Canary, Feb 2, 13:47:19
      - not with a front four of Mbokani, Naismith, Bamford & Wes (NCFC) - mr carra, Feb 2, 14:07:20
      - Still need 2 DM even if Klose is good, that's how a lot of teams play these days (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 2, 13:51:48
- He's not a target man but he plays up front and tries to run in behind (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 2, 13:29:49
- He'll do a Naismith and drift along that front line, causing havoc. Sniffing a pocket of s (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 2, 13:17:08
  - Would LOVE it! (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Feb 2, 13:22:34
    - I reckon we'll win tonight. 2-1. It would be classic Norwich after last weeks shame-scenes (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 2, 13:26:24
      - I reckon we'll win 5-4 after being 3-1 down .... (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 2, 13:32:30
- He'll be after Mbokani's position (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 2, 13:01:40
- He played upfront with vossen behind him most of the time I think (n/m) (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 2, 12:59:17

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.