I'm thinking Bamford is more of an attacking midfielder/second striker

Maybe the Wes role? Have I got that completely wrong?

Seems like he may be too lightweight to lead the line. Played second striker last year behind Kike. Is that where people suggest he might play?

Posted By: scotchcanary on February 2nd 2016 at 12:57:04

Message Thread

I'm thinking Bamford is more of an attacking midfielder/second striker (NCFC) - scotchcanary, Feb 2, 12:57:04
- I'd like him as one of 3 in behind Mbok i.e. with Wes and Nasmith (NCFC) - Basingstoke_Canary, Feb 2, 13:31:01
  - that relies on Howson being a much better DM than he was against Liverpool (NCFC) - mr carra, Feb 2, 13:37:05
    - Relying on Klose being good so 2 DMs not required. tettey is enough (n/m) (NCFC) - Basingstoke_Canary, Feb 2, 13:47:19
      - not with a front four of Mbokani, Naismith, Bamford & Wes (NCFC) - mr carra, Feb 2, 14:07:20
      - Still need 2 DM even if Klose is good, that's how a lot of teams play these days (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Feb 2, 13:51:48
- He's not a target man but he plays up front and tries to run in behind (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 2, 13:29:49
- He'll do a Naismith and drift along that front line, causing havoc. Sniffing a pocket of s (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 2, 13:17:08
  - Would LOVE it! (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Feb 2, 13:22:34
    - I reckon we'll win tonight. 2-1. It would be classic Norwich after last weeks shame-scenes (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Feb 2, 13:26:24
      - I reckon we'll win 5-4 after being 3-1 down .... (n/m) (NCFC) - paulg, Feb 2, 13:32:30
- He'll be after Mbokani's position (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Feb 2, 13:01:40
- He played upfront with vossen behind him most of the time I think (n/m) (NCFC) - hoolahan, Feb 2, 12:59:17

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.