I agree they combined well at times
But (at the risk of sending Common Sense Police into apoplexy) I do think we are defensively weaker then (although Naisy puts himself about defensively, more than I expected. He looks like a BRILLIANT buy on the evidence of one match!)
Posted By: Old Git on January 24th 2016 at 10:31:21
Message Thread
- One positive from yesterday Wes and Naismith ... (NCFC) - loz, Jan 24, 10:26:49
- Only if we play fullbacks who stay back (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Jan 24, 10:37:09
- They dont have to stay back as long as someone covers them, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 24, 10:39:37
- Well wes won't will he? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Jan 24, 11:20:07
- Well of course he won't, he's not a holding midfielder. (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 24, 11:32:04
- Need one of the holding midfielders to do it which they didn't yesterday. (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Jan 24, 11:21:21
- Well wes won't will he? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Jan 24, 11:20:07
- They dont have to stay back as long as someone covers them, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 24, 10:39:37
- I thought the shape and the formation was a really good one for us, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 24, 10:31:31
- Good shape and formation but not suitable for either fullback or DM's (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 24, 10:36:28
- I disagree, with the right players i think it's a good system (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 24, 10:38:23
- Brady and Pinto are wingbacks not full backs. Give Pinto a right midfield spot (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 24, 12:14:04
- I disagree, with the right players i think it's a good system (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 24, 10:38:23
- Isn't I hope you meant!! (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 24, 10:34:28
- Yes, isn't! (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 24, 10:35:54
- Good shape and formation but not suitable for either fullback or DM's (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 24, 10:36:28
- I agree they combined well at times (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 24, 10:31:21
- In fairness that was never the argument (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 24, 11:00:09
- What if we had Mbok, Wes and Naisy lining up as yesterday, but Tettey and GON instead of (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 24, 11:20:39
- I'd prefer to keep Howson in but that would be better. (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 24, 11:33:00
- It could work (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 24, 11:32:27
- That's Howson not great as a winger, not Naismith (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 24, 11:39:58
- What if we had Mbok, Wes and Naisy lining up as yesterday, but Tettey and GON instead of (NCFC) - Old Git, Jan 24, 11:20:39
- Can't be fit either hardly played for best part of 3 months (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 24, 10:34:05
- In fairness that was never the argument (NCFC) - Common Sense Police, Jan 24, 11:00:09
- Only if we play fullbacks who stay back (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Jan 24, 10:37:09
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.