Always makes me wonder why teams don't do both.

Being flippant I know, but surely the defence is always trying to keep a clean sheet? I know it's about the balance of the team which means when you go defensive you lose some of the attacking impetus, but still.

Posted By: APB on January 20th 2016 at 08:00:56

Message Thread

Even with Naismith I still do not think there's enough goals in our team to stay up (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 20, 01:41:56
- Goals aren't the problem, defending is. (NCFC) - Sanity, Jan 20, 03:41:17
  - spot on (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Jan 20, 08:01:55
  - vmt (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 20, 07:36:50
    - Always makes me wonder why teams don't do both. (NCFC) - APB, Jan 20, 08:00:56
  - ^This x 100 (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 20, 07:11:37
  - Nail. Head. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Jan 20, 05:50:51
- oh well, we're fucked then (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 20, 01:48:10
  - I suggest we buy a new striker to cure the problem. (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 20, 02:19:35
    - We will (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 20, 02:32:03

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.