I'm not so keen on Brady at LB personally

it seems a bit of a waste to have probably our most creative and influential attacking player stuck in his own half for most of the game.

Also, not convinced he is a better defender than Olsson.

Posted By: Mecagoenti on January 16th 2016 at 10:44:11

Message Thread

What's your first choice back four next week then? Options galore (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 16, 10:17:58
- If all fit, Brady-Klose-Bennett-Pinto (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Jan 16, 10:31:27
  - I'm not so keen on Brady at LB personally (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 16, 10:44:11
    - Think AN plays Brady when he feels he needs a more pacy left back (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Jan 16, 11:04:40
      - do you think he is significantly faster than Olsson then? (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 16, 11:07:32
        
        I think so... in games where he has been up against a speedy (NCFC) - Pixelman, Jan 16, 11:12:00
        
        you may be right; but, even so (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 16, 11:46:29
    - yes for me (n/m) (NCFC) - CWC, Jan 16, 10:55:05
    - Would you put Brady and Jarvo on the wings and bench Redz with Oly at LB? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Jan 16, 10:49:23
      - yeah, I think so (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 16, 11:04:49
      - This would be awesome (n/m) (NCFC) - hoolahan, Jan 16, 10:55:43
  - I'll second this (n/m) (NCFC) - CauldRon, Jan 16, 10:34:03
    - Id like to think that would be it. Strong on paper (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 16, 10:41:12

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.