The total ban thing is a bit of a straw man, no? That's not what Obama is advocating; he
is calling for stricter background checks. And in that respect the majority are with him.
Posted By: Sir Thomas on January 2nd 2016 at 22:57:32
Message Thread
- Obama trying to address the gun problem in the states..... (NCFC) - Men without hats, Jan 2, 22:22:36
- Using "executive power" isn't he? (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Jan 2, 22:38:46
- He is trying but NRA too much power I reckon. (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Jan 2, 22:42:32
- He's got nothing to lose, i suppose (NCFC) - Huge Small, Jan 2, 22:33:25
- But that's why he's preparing to use executive powers - he can try to bypass them. (n/m) (NCFC) - Sir Thomas, Jan 2, 22:26:48
- He has abused it enough already so it won't make any difference. (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:40:45
- Got a big gun have you John ? Only 2 things come front Texan ........ (NCFC) - Men without hats, Jan 2, 22:44:26
- If Obama was that keen to change the laws he could have done it when he had a majority (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:46:07
- Smart politics then? He perceives that a majority of the American people are on his side (NCFC) - Sir Thomas, Jan 2, 22:49:07
- Simply not true, the majority are not on his side, this is not party politics (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:50:22
- When you say they are not on his side, what do you mean specifically? This is in line with (NCFC) - Sir Thomas, Jan 2, 22:52:21
- Yes thats a fair representation (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:55:32
- The total ban thing is a bit of a straw man, no? That's not what Obama is advocating; he (NCFC) - Sir Thomas, Jan 2, 22:57:32
- The problem with background checks is that the companies doing them are (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 23:05:29
- The total ban thing is a bit of a straw man, no? That's not what Obama is advocating; he (NCFC) - Sir Thomas, Jan 2, 22:57:32
- Yes thats a fair representation (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:55:32
- When you say they are not on his side, what do you mean specifically? This is in line with (NCFC) - Sir Thomas, Jan 2, 22:52:21
- Simply not true, the majority are not on his side, this is not party politics (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:50:22
- Ok so what are your views on it John. Is it a 'right to bear arms' or what ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Jan 2, 22:48:06
- I favour stricter gun control..... (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:52:01
- Blimey! 300 million guns! (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Jan 2, 22:54:45
- yep, and those are probably conservative estimates. (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:55:58
- Fair enough, the gi's I worked with seemed prob 70-30% in favour of stricter gun laws (NCFC) - Men without hats, Jan 2, 23:00:28
- LOL, probably correct (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 23:03:48
- Fair enough, the gi's I worked with seemed prob 70-30% in favour of stricter gun laws (NCFC) - Men without hats, Jan 2, 23:00:28
- yep, and those are probably conservative estimates. (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:55:58
- Blimey! 300 million guns! (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Jan 2, 22:54:45
- I favour stricter gun control..... (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:52:01
- Smart politics then? He perceives that a majority of the American people are on his side (NCFC) - Sir Thomas, Jan 2, 22:49:07
- If Obama was that keen to change the laws he could have done it when he had a majority (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:46:07
- Got a big gun have you John ? Only 2 things come front Texan ........ (NCFC) - Men without hats, Jan 2, 22:44:26
- He has abused it enough already so it won't make any difference. (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:40:45
- Using "executive power" isn't he? (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Jan 2, 22:38:46
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.