He has abused it enough already so it won't make any difference.
Except he called them executive 'memorandum' to make himself look better.
Its like Cameron bypassing Parliament, imagine how well that would go down.
Posted By: John in Texas on January 2nd 2016 at 22:40:45
Message Thread
- Obama trying to address the gun problem in the states..... (NCFC) - Men without hats, Jan 2, 22:22:36
- Using "executive power" isn't he? (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Jan 2, 22:38:46
- He is trying but NRA too much power I reckon. (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Jan 2, 22:42:32
- He's got nothing to lose, i suppose (NCFC) - Huge Small, Jan 2, 22:33:25
- But that's why he's preparing to use executive powers - he can try to bypass them. (n/m) (NCFC) - Sir Thomas, Jan 2, 22:26:48
- He has abused it enough already so it won't make any difference. (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:40:45
- Got a big gun have you John ? Only 2 things come front Texan ........ (NCFC) - Men without hats, Jan 2, 22:44:26
- If Obama was that keen to change the laws he could have done it when he had a majority (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:46:07
- Smart politics then? He perceives that a majority of the American people are on his side (NCFC) - Sir Thomas, Jan 2, 22:49:07
- Simply not true, the majority are not on his side, this is not party politics (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:50:22
- When you say they are not on his side, what do you mean specifically? This is in line with (NCFC) - Sir Thomas, Jan 2, 22:52:21
- Yes thats a fair representation (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:55:32
- The total ban thing is a bit of a straw man, no? That's not what Obama is advocating; he (NCFC) - Sir Thomas, Jan 2, 22:57:32
- The problem with background checks is that the companies doing them are (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 23:05:29
- The total ban thing is a bit of a straw man, no? That's not what Obama is advocating; he (NCFC) - Sir Thomas, Jan 2, 22:57:32
- Yes thats a fair representation (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:55:32
- When you say they are not on his side, what do you mean specifically? This is in line with (NCFC) - Sir Thomas, Jan 2, 22:52:21
- Simply not true, the majority are not on his side, this is not party politics (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:50:22
- Ok so what are your views on it John. Is it a 'right to bear arms' or what ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Jan 2, 22:48:06
- I favour stricter gun control..... (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:52:01
- Blimey! 300 million guns! (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Jan 2, 22:54:45
- yep, and those are probably conservative estimates. (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:55:58
- Fair enough, the gi's I worked with seemed prob 70-30% in favour of stricter gun laws (NCFC) - Men without hats, Jan 2, 23:00:28
- LOL, probably correct (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 23:03:48
- Fair enough, the gi's I worked with seemed prob 70-30% in favour of stricter gun laws (NCFC) - Men without hats, Jan 2, 23:00:28
- yep, and those are probably conservative estimates. (n/m) (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:55:58
- Blimey! 300 million guns! (NCFC) - Bravo win or die, Jan 2, 22:54:45
- I favour stricter gun control..... (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:52:01
- Smart politics then? He perceives that a majority of the American people are on his side (NCFC) - Sir Thomas, Jan 2, 22:49:07
- If Obama was that keen to change the laws he could have done it when he had a majority (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:46:07
- Got a big gun have you John ? Only 2 things come front Texan ........ (NCFC) - Men without hats, Jan 2, 22:44:26
- He has abused it enough already so it won't make any difference. (NCFC) - John in Texas, Jan 2, 22:40:45
- Using "executive power" isn't he? (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Jan 2, 22:38:46
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.