those early games were the indication we weren't quite good enough

they say the sign of a good team is one that can win even when playing badly, sol what does it say about one that can't win when playing well

We were "dominating possession in games and creating chances" because our midfield is decent but we didn't win those games because our strikers and defenders aren't quite up to it (we miss the chances we create and then allow our opponents cheap goals from their possession)

I'd like less chopping and changing too but we we have to try and find out what our best approach is first (given our poor return from a pretty easy opening schedule we had to try something different). And I'm still not sure what it is...

Posted By: mr carra on December 7th 2015 at 08:34:27

Message Thread

So I missed the footy Saturday a Few Q's (NCFC) - Taxi 4 Johnson, Dec 7, 06:21:29
- It was clueless, we made a Pulis side look a Guardiola one. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Dec 7, 08:31:46
- 3. Yes, it wasn't good at all (NCFC) - KentonCanary, Dec 7, 08:05:14
- answers: (NCFC) - pab, Dec 7, 07:05:05
  - I don't accept the players are not good enough (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 7, 08:00:31
    - those early games were the indication we weren't quite good enough (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 7, 08:34:27
      - Yes although we were also very unlucky. Jerome goal against Palace and Butland having (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 7, 09:42:01
        
        agree Butland had a great day (NCFC) - mr carra, Dec 7, 10:12:25
        
        He's on record post match saying he told them to "go long" isn't he? (NCFC) - Jim, Dec 7, 10:39:37
    - promoted teams often start off well (NCFC) - pab, Dec 7, 08:21:20

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.