I like how that article
has not just one, but two different pictures of the entrance to Southwark Crown Court, plus one random Panda, none of which are actually pertinent to the case in question, since he didn't break into Southwark Crown Counrt, and didn't see an actual Panda.
Clearly, as you intimate, the author of the article is a Wrather.
Posted By: NJ_Canary on December 4th 2015 at 17:13:07
Message Thread
- So which one of you... (General Chat) - Bungle, Dec 4, 17:00:37
- I like how that article (General Chat) - NJ_Canary, Dec 4, 17:13:07
- I thought the photo was of the woman (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Dec 4, 17:34:19
- That'll be the drugs (n/m) (General Chat) - Higher Wrather, Dec 4, 18:04:37
- Oh (General Chat) - NJ_Canary, Dec 4, 17:59:19
- Dandy NLP was a panda (n/m) (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Dec 4, 17:14:55
- I'd made that connection. *winks* (General Chat) - APB, Dec 4, 17:49:38
- The panda is me but the pic wasn't taken in Southwark... (General Chat) - Dandy Highburyman, Dec 4, 18:46:58
- I'd made that connection. *winks* (General Chat) - APB, Dec 4, 17:49:38
- I thought the photo was of the woman (n/m) (General Chat) - Steve in Holland, Dec 4, 17:34:19
- Not me or my Garry before any of you say it! (n/m) (General Chat) - Jumbo1, Dec 4, 17:09:23
- I like how that article (General Chat) - NJ_Canary, Dec 4, 17:13:07
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.