the offence isn't "*tried* to deny a goalscoring opportunity"

the offence isn't "tried to deny a goalscoring opportunity"

it's that you actually did deny one. So yes, the nature of the offence does depend, in this case, on what the ball does afterwards.

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on November 16th 2015 at 14:47:31

Message Thread

Will never get bored of watching this... (NCFC) - Pixelman, Nov 16, 13:07:12
- it was never a handball and the keeper nearly saved the pen (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Nov 16, 16:19:57
  - we miss that easy 6 points......... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Nov 16, 16:49:07
- I had forgotten just how gutted Ipswich were (NCFC) - Highlander, Nov 16, 13:44:24
  - still that have "that goal" to remember. Bless 'em. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Nov 16, 13:57:41
  - If Berra handles the shot but it still goes in, does he get sent off? (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Nov 16, 13:57:23
    - Depends if the ref allowed the goal or not... (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Nov 16, 14:36:50
      - ha I thought the same (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Nov 16, 14:40:07
    - No. 'Cos wouldnt have denied a clear goalscoring opportunity. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 16, 14:22:05
    - probably a yellow (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Nov 16, 13:59:37
      - yes, that was my understanding, but it seems weird that you could make the same offence (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Nov 16, 14:35:50
        
        There are two offences though aren't there? (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Nov 16, 14:38:24
        
        yes, that's true too (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Nov 16, 14:42:13
        
        the offence isn't "*tried* to deny a goalscoring opportunity" (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 16, 14:47:31
        
        so if he saves it and the ball rebounds off a defender into the goal (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Nov 16, 14:52:17
        
        in theory probably the ref could (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 16, 15:04:54
        
        exactly. Becomes a different offence if a goal (or goalscoring opportunity) is denied. (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 16, 14:41:25
        
        *Paul Allen" (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 16, 14:43:42
        
        26 seconds in.... (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 16, 14:45:01
        
        I remember it well (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Nov 16, 14:47:00
        
        He was 17 and 256 days old! (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Nov 16, 14:59:24
        
        you knew that without having to check, didn't you... (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 16, 15:06:15
        
        It's saved in my spreadsheet. (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Nov 16, 16:42:54
        
        He was just given as an answer on Pointless (NCFC) - Huge Small, Nov 16, 18:32:51
        
        I've thought he was 15 all this time for some reason (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Nov 16, 15:01:57
        
        yup. I remember my nine-year-old rage, too. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 16, 14:48:41

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.