"our current injury-induced paucity of wingers"
One game.
As far as I'm aware both are expected to be back well before January, so the Murphys' loan situation is relevant how exactly?
But if you're that worried what about Eliott Bennett? He's probably better than the Murphs at this point and will presumably be back from loan earlier?
Posted By: mr carra on November 9th 2015 at 13:25:02
Message Thread
- Just realised both the Murphys are out on loan for the whole season (NCFC) - King, Nov 9, 12:41:37
- "our current injury-induced paucity of wingers" (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 9, 13:25:02
- Sure but I'm not sure two wingers can really be considered strength in depth (NCFC) - King, Nov 9, 13:35:35
- I agree, but if Alex was happy to go with two earlier I guess he still will be? (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 9, 13:42:00
- Sure but I'm not sure two wingers can really be considered strength in depth (NCFC) - King, Nov 9, 13:35:35
- Season long loans generally have a January recall clause. (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 9, 13:08:30
- That would normally depend on the borrowing team's consent though, right? (n/m) (NCFC) - King, Nov 9, 13:15:41
- I don't know how they're actually worded, but the name 'recall clause' would suggest not, (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Nov 9, 14:32:02
- That would normally depend on the borrowing team's consent though, right? (n/m) (NCFC) - King, Nov 9, 13:15:41
- yes Neil Adams may have been a bit over eager (NCFC) - pab, Nov 9, 12:48:19
- I agree to an extent (NCFC) - King, Nov 9, 13:04:35
- "our current injury-induced paucity of wingers" (NCFC) - mr carra, Nov 9, 13:25:02
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.