exactly

And that's why I specified that originally.

I mean, it's fairly obvious that the side that won the championship is better than the current s**te, or the bunch that Worthy inherited. I was just meaning if you could pick any of the players that have been here in that period.

Posted By: Hull Canary on January 18th 2006 at 12:28:17

Message Thread

Best and Worst XI since Worthy has been manager (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Jan 18, 12:01:35
- Best XI... (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 18, 12:26:23
  - Iwan was better than Crouch for us... (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 18, 12:46:28
  - The Doc is better than Davenport (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 18, 12:29:42
    - But we've seen the Doc at his worst, too. (n/m) (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Jan 18, 12:30:31
    - Yes, but Davenport didn't have a season of being Very Bad in the Prem. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 18, 12:30:18
      - would have done if he'd been playing alongside Flem (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 18, 12:46:51
        
        Shackell looked alright next to Flem, I thought ... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 18, 12:47:34
        
        Shacks was dreadful away from home (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 18, 12:52:08
        
        Yes, but the Doc was dreadful everywhere! (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 18, 12:53:11
        
        the Doc was good... (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 18, 13:00:14
        
        I don't dislike him, he works very hard and seems like a reasonable bloke ... (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 18, 13:02:12
      - True... (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 18, 12:32:31
        
        That's true. Wasn't playing for us, though! (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 18, 12:33:52
- Here... (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 18, 12:12:15
  - Your best XI is missing IX players. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 18, 12:13:07
    - 9 one of thems Anselin (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 18, 12:14:54
      - That would make VIII missing. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 18, 12:17:53
    - :o) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 18, 12:13:46
- Best (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 18, 12:06:59
  - I'd swap Nedergaard in for Jonson on the right (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 18, 12:19:56
    - You're missing the point... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 18, 12:23:32
      - Which wasn't the point of the question. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 18, 12:24:56
        
        Yeah well I thought I'd give an answer which was based on (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 18, 12:30:14
        
        but that's the point of a hypothetical question (n/m) (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Jan 18, 12:31:43
        
        Well, then hypothetically: (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 18, 12:47:06
        
        exactly (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Jan 18, 12:28:17
        
        You know... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 18, 12:31:28
        
        Hmmm (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Jan 18, 12:34:05
        
        It's a good question. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 18, 12:32:37
        
        Well, you have to specifiy 'the playing atthier best' bit (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 18, 12:30:46
        
        be fair (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Jan 18, 12:41:18
        
        well on that basis... (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 18, 12:52:06
        
        not saying it should be ignored (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Jan 18, 13:00:42
        
        Yeah, I know. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 18, 12:46:02
        
        Francis too... (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Jan 18, 12:32:20
  - mine would be (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Jan 18, 12:15:35
    - Nedergaard ahead of Edworthy for me. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 18, 12:18:50
      - good point (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Jan 18, 12:20:43
  - Edworthy and Super Tom? (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 18, 12:10:24
    - Yeah when Worthy realised he was better as CM than Holt (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 18, 12:20:34

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.