That would make VIII missing.

The Holt of the playoff season),the Huckerby of the promotion season, the Anselin and VIII others.

Why do sports use XI and not 11? Most confusing. I mean - most here have difficulty enough counting to eleven without taking their socks off as it is, without bringing Roman numerals into the equation.

Posted By: Arizona Bay on January 18th 2006 at 12:17:53

Message Thread

Best and Worst XI since Worthy has been manager (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Jan 18, 12:01:35
- Best XI... (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 18, 12:26:23
  - Iwan was better than Crouch for us... (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 18, 12:46:28
  - The Doc is better than Davenport (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 18, 12:29:42
    - But we've seen the Doc at his worst, too. (n/m) (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Jan 18, 12:30:31
    - Yes, but Davenport didn't have a season of being Very Bad in the Prem. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 18, 12:30:18
      - would have done if he'd been playing alongside Flem (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 18, 12:46:51
        
        Shackell looked alright next to Flem, I thought ... (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 18, 12:47:34
        
        Shacks was dreadful away from home (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 18, 12:52:08
        
        Yes, but the Doc was dreadful everywhere! (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 18, 12:53:11
        
        the Doc was good... (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 18, 13:00:14
        
        I don't dislike him, he works very hard and seems like a reasonable bloke ... (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 18, 13:02:12
      - True... (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 18, 12:32:31
        
        That's true. Wasn't playing for us, though! (n/m) (NCFC) - Ottosson Foxtrot, Jan 18, 12:33:52
- Here... (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 18, 12:12:15
  - Your best XI is missing IX players. (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 18, 12:13:07
    - 9 one of thems Anselin (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 18, 12:14:54
      - That would make VIII missing. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 18, 12:17:53
    - :o) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 18, 12:13:46
- Best (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 18, 12:06:59
  - I'd swap Nedergaard in for Jonson on the right (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 18, 12:19:56
    - You're missing the point... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 18, 12:23:32
      - Which wasn't the point of the question. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 18, 12:24:56
        
        Yeah well I thought I'd give an answer which was based on (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 18, 12:30:14
        
        but that's the point of a hypothetical question (n/m) (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Jan 18, 12:31:43
        
        Well, then hypothetically: (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 18, 12:47:06
        
        exactly (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Jan 18, 12:28:17
        
        You know... (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 18, 12:31:28
        
        Hmmm (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Jan 18, 12:34:05
        
        It's a good question. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 18, 12:32:37
        
        Well, you have to specifiy 'the playing atthier best' bit (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 18, 12:30:46
        
        be fair (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Jan 18, 12:41:18
        
        well on that basis... (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 18, 12:52:06
        
        not saying it should be ignored (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Jan 18, 13:00:42
        
        Yeah, I know. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 18, 12:46:02
        
        Francis too... (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Jan 18, 12:32:20
  - mine would be (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Jan 18, 12:15:35
    - Nedergaard ahead of Edworthy for me. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 18, 12:18:50
      - good point (NCFC) - Hull Canary, Jan 18, 12:20:43
  - Edworthy and Super Tom? (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 18, 12:10:24
    - Yeah when Worthy realised he was better as CM than Holt (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Jan 18, 12:20:34

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.