The implication being that one of the deals is

Dependent on the selling club getting someone else in first?

Although the fact one is dependent on the player deciding we are the right club makes it hard to see how it can be stated with any certainty that two deals will be sealed.

Posted By: Jim on August 28th 2015 at 10:30:47

Message Thread

Two deals (NCFC) - notmean_nige, Aug 28, 10:11:38
- Positions known? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mozzer, Aug 28, 11:13:47
- Source? (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Aug 28, 10:14:17
- Isn't that 3? (n/m) (NCFC) - oh huckerby, Aug 28, 10:12:47
  - The implication being that one of the deals is (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 28, 10:30:47
  - No because only 2 of the 3 will be completed (n/m) (NCFC) - notmean_nige, Aug 28, 10:13:15
    - Can we do 2.5 deals......... (n/m) (NCFC) - usacanary, Aug 28, 15:11:55
    - So why mention 3? (n/m) (NCFC) - harry boulders, Aug 28, 10:17:08
      - Three options, two will happen. Pretty clear? (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Aug 28, 10:37:11
        
        (Or less than 2, presumably (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 28, 10:40:27

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.