definitely - pretty hard to be consistent with split-second decisions

that are usually a matter of opinion though.
at the very least refs should be miked up to explain themselves, and I think the future has to be some kind of group decision based on one or more physical refs and refs watching videos.

Surely a second or two is enough to do that.

Posted By: Worzel Scrimmage on August 17th 2015 at 20:12:22

Message Thread

muff going for it open game (n/m) (Other Football) - SCC 28, Aug 17, 20:05:36
- ooooh disallowed goal (n/m) (Other Football) - SCC 28, Aug 17, 20:05:52
  - bit harsh to say the least (Other Football) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 17, 20:06:58
    - really poor decision, things like that are so inconsistently applied (n/m) (Other Football) - Mecagoenti, Aug 17, 20:07:53
      - definitely - pretty hard to be consistent with split-second decisions (Other Football) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 17, 20:12:22
        
        a decision like that would be ideal for a video ref (Other Football) - Mecagoenti, Aug 17, 20:19:12
        
        absolutely, it's definitely doable, but they'll fight against it (Other Football) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 17, 20:22:39
        
        No, that's the worst kind of decision for a video ref (Other Football) - norway, Aug 17, 20:29:25
        
        hence the panel. A couple of seconds is sufficient for 5 people to press a button (Other Football) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 17, 20:32:23
        
        Well that way lies madness. (Other Football) - norway, Aug 17, 20:35:02
        
        true, I don't necessarily think that an off-the-cuff solution (Other Football) - Worzel Scrimmage, Aug 17, 20:39:59

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.