The question over Hooper
Dont get me wrong, i like him and think he's a great finisher.... I prefer him over grabban BUT as others below stated not in that lone role. I agree he's too slow, not beefy enough and gets pushed off the ball.... Is this a classic case of 'looked outstanding in scotland playing for the glasgow barcelona versus the dog and duck' week in week out?!
Posted By: Cheltenham_Canary on August 13th 2015 at 12:57:55
Message Thread
- The question over Hooper (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Aug 13, 12:57:55
- is great when (NCFC) - pab, Aug 13, 13:15:21
- Little slow..yes fedinately could work harder but not beefy enough and (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Aug 13, 13:01:12
- I would say CamJam is our physically strongest striker at present (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Aug 13, 13:06:31
- CamJam physically our strongest striker and IMO the best finisher.... (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Aug 13, 14:15:04
- Jerome all round physically our best but I'd still say Hooper (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Aug 13, 13:14:27
- I'd say CamJam was hardest to knock off the ball, (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Aug 13, 14:16:04
- Agreed, his goal in the play off final was somewhat "Holtesque" (n/m) (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Aug 13, 14:29:54
- Off the ball* (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Aug 13, 13:14:48
- I'd say CamJam was hardest to knock off the ball, (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Aug 13, 14:16:04
- I would say CamJam is our physically strongest striker at present (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Aug 13, 13:06:31
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.