"Would have" is not the same as "couldn't rule it out"
The destiny of the game hinged on the decisions.
The disallowed goal and penalty shout were not pre-emptive equalisers.
Posted By: norway on August 9th 2015 at 12:02:09
Message Thread
- Thoughts from yesterday... (NCFC) - hairyolaf, Aug 9, 11:45:08
- My point was .. (NCFC) - hairyolaf, Aug 9, 11:56:30
- "Would have" is not the same as "couldn't rule it out" (NCFC) - norway, Aug 9, 12:02:09
- People seem to struggle to grasp this concept. (NCFC) - CauldRon, Aug 9, 12:47:45
- I always feel sorry for the player in this situation (NCFC) - Jester, Aug 9, 12:52:30
- Yeah and his confidence would be up (NCFC) - CauldRon, Aug 9, 12:53:30
- I always feel sorry for the player in this situation (NCFC) - Jester, Aug 9, 12:52:30
- People seem to struggle to grasp this concept. (NCFC) - CauldRon, Aug 9, 12:47:45
- "Would have" is not the same as "couldn't rule it out" (NCFC) - norway, Aug 9, 12:02:09
- "Would have only got us a 3-3 draw" (NCFC) - norway, Aug 9, 11:49:03
- Yes. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Aug 9, 11:53:44
- Great point. 4-3 it is and space/time can go fuck itself. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Aug 9, 11:59:04
- Yes. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Aug 9, 11:53:44
- Only 2 unlucky moments (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 9, 11:48:15
- Obviously. (NCFC) - norway, Aug 9, 11:50:10
- My point was .. (NCFC) - hairyolaf, Aug 9, 11:56:30
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.