In a system that suits I think he'd be excellent.
Seems to me AN wants to set up for a lone striker. I think Wickam COULD be excellent. Has all the attributes. BUT... Here's what I've heard from someone well connected to Ipswich (I had the good fortune to watch the 1-5 in a box surrounded by binners). One of those present told me this: the day he signed an improved deal (if I remember correctly) at Ipswich, he, his mum and dad went out and got totally munted (at the club's expense) to such an extent that all three had to be driven home and shoved through their own front doorway. He is a liability in term of his own fitness and well- being Is basically what I was told. Could be BS of course but would explain his lack of consistency.
Posted By: avenging canary on July 31st 2015 at 19:32:26
Message Thread
- Pains me to say, but would have been happy with Conor Wickham at ?8m (n/m) (NCFC) - stowch, Jul 31, 19:01:31
- Palace have made some decent signings (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jul 31, 22:11:59
- Murray to us? (n/m) (NCFC) - notmean_nige, Jul 31, 22:10:11
- In a system that suits I think he'd be excellent. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Jul 31, 19:32:26
- Hugely overpriced (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jul 31, 19:23:38
- lol - he would never have come here and most wouldn't have accepted him (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Jul 31, 19:18:27
- No better than what we have. (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Jul 31, 19:14:23
- If palace actually play him up top he should do well, sland seemed to always.., (NCFC) - glasgow, Jul 31, 19:04:10
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.