Don't forget Cameron was fighting against constituency boundaries bent in Labour's favour

ever since 1997

Which they are still fighting against, because the LibDems wouldn't support boundary reform (ie bend them in THEIR favour, the whole thing sucks) because the conservatives wouldn't support Lords reform ....

On and on and on

Posted By: Old Git on April 2nd 2015 at 23:02:29

Message Thread

Sturgeon, Would (!), and Ed did quite well. (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Apr 2, 22:47:40
- He really didn't. False. Game hand gestures. He (NCFC) - Jim, Apr 2, 22:59:17
  - I disagree. He's very cleverly encouraged low expectations (NCFC) - Old Man, Apr 2, 23:11:58
- Labour would win election if he was in charge. Wrong brother (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Apr 2, 22:48:37
  - The Civil Service used to refer to Ed as "the evil of two lessers". (NCFC) - Old Man, Apr 2, 22:51:46
    - Don't forget Cameron was fighting against constituency boundaries bent in Labour's favour (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 2, 23:02:29
      - Should get Shirley Porter in to move the unwanted Labour voters out of marginal seats... (n/m) (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, Apr 2, 23:32:09
        
        Old school! (n/m) (NCFC) - woody, Apr 3, 00:27:11
      - Oh absolutely - I've always said the Lords thing was an entirely Pyrrhic Tory "victory" (NCFC) - Old Man, Apr 2, 23:07:07
        
        Well then (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 2, 23:11:06
        
        But that's precisely how he is viewed by his party (NCFC) - Old Man, Apr 2, 23:13:54
        
        No one could rate him (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 2, 23:18:39
        
        Ps I really enjoyed the evil of two lessers (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 2, 23:11:41
    - Fair point tho (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Apr 2, 22:55:30
  - *Wasn't * (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Apr 2, 22:48:57

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.