Watford should have been down to 10 men earlier in the game
Posted By: emmaroyds on February 22nd 2015 at 17:56:01
Message Thread
- Mind you, here's the other thing about Wes' dive (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Feb 22, 17:53:42
- Let's be honest about this (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 22, 18:05:40
- it's part of the game... We should take advantage of it. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 22, 18:52:01
- That's fine. Just don't blub when we're on the receiving end (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 22, 19:19:18
- It is clever when so many important decisions had already gone against us (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Feb 22, 18:07:41
- vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Feb 22, 18:07:10
- it's part of the game... We should take advantage of it. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Feb 22, 18:52:01
- Its not beyond the realms of possibility that Wes lost control of his legs (NCFC) - Goalmusic, Feb 22, 17:56:55
- Watford should have been down to 10 men earlier in the game (n/m) (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Feb 22, 17:56:01
- Watson should have been booked for clattering Hoolahan on 3 occasions, with the booking (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 22, 17:59:45
- Yes they should. Which reminds us that when managers say "that decision cost us x points" (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Feb 22, 17:59:42
- But what is cheating? sticking a team in a small disgusting changing room, painted in a (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 22, 18:16:53
- Exactly. Fucking spot on! (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, Feb 22, 18:20:11
- But what is cheating? sticking a team in a small disgusting changing room, painted in a (NCFC) - lovely old job, Feb 22, 18:16:53
- Let's be honest about this (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Feb 22, 18:05:40
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.