Which is why should have played 5 incl McGrandles and Wes
Posted By: BINMEN8R on January 25th 2015 at 14:49:09
Message Thread
- A midfield containing 4/5 of Redmond, Wes, BJ, Howson, Tettey, O'Neil and Vadis (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 25, 14:38:55
- Fine but when 4 are unavailable it makes it difficult (NCFC) - trt354, Jan 25, 14:44:07
- Manager should've of have played himself #FACT (NCFC) - harry boulders, Jan 25, 15:01:27
- surely he would have been a better option than Whittaker! (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 25, 15:03:18
- Agreed. And I bet he thought about it as well. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 25, 15:08:43
- yeah, true (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 25, 15:14:27
- Agreed. And I bet he thought about it as well. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 25, 15:08:43
- surely he would have been a better option than Whittaker! (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 25, 15:03:18
- Which is why should have played 5 incl McGrandles and Wes (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Jan 25, 14:49:09
- That harsh, upheld red agasinst Lego, has really counted against us... (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Jan 25, 14:48:52
- yep I was pretty pissed off when I thought about that yesterday (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 25, 14:49:41
- Manager should've of have played himself #FACT (NCFC) - harry boulders, Jan 25, 15:01:27
- Fine but when 4 are unavailable it makes it difficult (NCFC) - trt354, Jan 25, 14:44:07
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.