he only chose to answer mild questions and i see he even
chose to answer one question that started off by complimenting him. He didn't answer any of my questions (which were not mild).
I found the bit quite funny where he reiterates the club will "re-invest every spare penny in football". Ah yes, that's every penny after various executives have been paid a generous bonus for non-football related achievements .....
Posted By: pab on December 9th 2014 at 13:32:54
Message Thread
- The Q&A seemed a bit mild IMO (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Dec 9, 12:42:08
- he only chose to answer mild questions and i see he even (NCFC) - pab, Dec 9, 13:32:54
- Absolutely... someone should have asked McNally (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:23:25
- do you think Hughton was prevented from signing a player or players that would have kept u (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 9, 13:49:00
- do you think any bonus related to finances (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:58:26
- THERE IS A PLAYING BUDGET (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 14:00:28
- He does, yes. (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 13:52:17
- do you think any bonus related to finances (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:58:26
- i asked that, almost word for word (n/m) (NCFC) - samcd84, Dec 9, 13:27:57
- Why didn't you? (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 13:25:38
- didn't realise it was on till now (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:26:49
- Damn. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 13:29:43
- Looks like samcd84 did try and ask it anyway (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:36:34
- Well, I imagine the answer would be quite simple (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 13:38:53
- so.... The Board's decision guaranteed McNally his bonus (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:39:39
- you do understand a budget is just a 'best hope' as to what will happen financially? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 9, 13:52:25
- absolutely... including player wages and spend (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:55:51
- so what's your point then? McNally got his bonus by preventing the overpsend on the playin (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 9, 14:00:14
- He has chosen to completely ignore logic (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 14:02:21
- good thinking (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 9, 14:04:39
- Go get that bonus. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 14:05:43
- good thinking (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 9, 14:04:39
- McNally has no input in player spend? (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 14:02:04
- He has chosen to completely ignore logic (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 14:02:21
- so what's your point then? McNally got his bonus by preventing the overpsend on the playin (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 9, 14:00:14
- absolutely... including player wages and spend (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:55:51
- This is answered in the Q&A (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 13:40:45
- It makes nothing clear at all. (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:43:55
- There is just no answer to that really (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 13:47:42
- Non football related targets = finances = January Spend (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:54:34
- and, wasn't iot reportsed that the AGM he told us it was finance related (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:47:05
- *it reported (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:47:15
- There is just no answer to that really (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 13:47:42
- It makes nothing clear at all. (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:43:55
- you do understand a budget is just a 'best hope' as to what will happen financially? (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 9, 13:52:25
- so.... The Board's decision guaranteed McNally his bonus (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:39:39
- Well, I imagine the answer would be quite simple (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 13:38:53
- Looks like samcd84 did try and ask it anyway (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:36:34
- Damn. (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 13:29:43
- didn't realise it was on till now (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:26:49
- do you think Hughton was prevented from signing a player or players that would have kept u (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Dec 9, 13:49:00
- North Korea couldn't have done a better job than our media team (n/m) (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Dec 9, 13:01:05
- I imagine they filtered out the insults and abuse (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 13:26:29
- He wouldn't have given an honest answer to anything contentious (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 9, 13:35:07
- So what were the contentious questions then? (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 13:35:47
- Well, I don't know (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 9, 14:00:32
- So what were the contentious questions then? (n/m) (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 13:35:47
- The one about Adams. (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Dec 9, 13:29:39
- Well that's a question that wasn't filtered out then (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 13:32:01
- VMT (NCFC) - CauldRon, Dec 9, 13:41:27
- Surely he could have at least have said something along the lines of (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Dec 9, 13:49:23
- absolutely -I don't expect to find out anything from these things (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 13:45:45
- you don't half talk out of your arse (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Dec 9, 14:02:56
- well what do you expect from these things? (NCFC) - phrankin, Dec 9, 14:08:20
- you don't half talk out of your arse (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Dec 9, 14:02:56
- VMT (NCFC) - CauldRon, Dec 9, 13:41:27
- Well that's a question that wasn't filtered out then (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 13:32:01
- He wouldn't have given an honest answer to anything contentious (NCFC) - duke of york, Dec 9, 13:35:07
- I imagine they filtered out the insults and abuse (NCFC) - norway, Dec 9, 13:26:29
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.