I know you weren't. But it is indeed possible that he would have us doing better
because the defence would probably be playing better and in this division he may not have been quite so timid and scared to attack!
I wouldn't have wanted to keep him though I hate how he ruined my enjoyment of watching us.
Posted By: Jim on November 11th 2014 at 09:23:01
Message Thread
- Did we get rid of Hoots too soon?, should we have kept him? (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Nov 11, 08:25:22
- We certainly picked the worst possible time that is for sure (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 11, 10:23:12
- I do believe Houghton would have achieved better results (NCFC) - CROYDONCANARY, Nov 11, 10:03:26
- No. We got rid of him too late. Its possible he may have done (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 11, 09:06:44
- I wasn't being entirely serious nate. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Nov 11, 09:14:33
- mate even. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Nov 11, 09:14:46
- I know you weren't. But it is indeed possible that he would have us doing better (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 11, 09:23:01
- mate even. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Nov 11, 09:14:46
- I wasn't being entirely serious nate. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Nov 11, 09:14:33
- Yes and yes. Hoots in. (n/m) (NCFC) - ghost of hucks, Nov 11, 08:55:34
- You'll never be a top class troller. That should have been a statement rather (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, Nov 11, 08:32:10
- Just putting it out there bro... (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Nov 11, 08:40:23
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.