He was s**te against Crawley
Posted By: Trent_Canary on November 9th 2014 at 20:34:22
Message Thread
- All this talk of passing attacking football (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 9, 19:46:04
- Surman played at Wolves and looked lightweight in centre mid. (n/m) (NCFC) - trianglepatch, Nov 9, 20:25:59
- lightweight? Proof England is still in the football equivalent of the stone age (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 9, 20:32:12
- But yet he's played there for Bournemouth and hasn't. Strange one that... (n/m) (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Nov 9, 20:29:41
- Surman was a slow lightweight, not a winger and not a Wes type (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Nov 9, 20:13:48
- Letting Surman, Snod and Pilks go and not replacing any of them (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 9, 20:24:37
- At the end of the day Surman wanted to leave (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Nov 9, 20:33:56
- Maybe he did but you can replace him (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 9, 21:05:42
- How do you know that? (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 9, 20:59:08
- .... (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Nov 9, 21:08:31
- ... doesn't actually say he wanted to leave, just that his situation was up in the air (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 9, 21:11:58
- Do I give a shit? (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Nov 9, 21:12:39
- ... doesn't actually say he wanted to leave, just that his situation was up in the air (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 9, 21:11:58
- .... (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Nov 9, 21:08:31
- At the end of the day Surman wanted to leave (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Nov 9, 20:33:56
- lightweight? no wonder we are dropping like a stone with that attitude. (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 9, 20:22:28
- yeah no wonder (NCFC) - Charles21, Nov 9, 20:56:18
- He was shite against Crawley (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Nov 9, 20:34:22
- Ruddy was shite against Middlesborough (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 9, 20:37:33
- but he doesnt want to leave (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Nov 9, 20:42:38
- How do you know that? (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 9, 20:57:09
- but he doesnt want to leave (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Nov 9, 20:42:38
- Ruddy was shite against Middlesborough (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 9, 20:37:33
- Yeah not up to it. Only playing regularly for lowly Bournemouth (n/m) (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, Nov 9, 20:15:42
- They had him last season and signed him up (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 9, 20:24:22
- Letting Surman, Snod and Pilks go and not replacing any of them (NCFC) - Jim, Nov 9, 20:24:37
- The best one for me is how some fans still criticise Wes...God we miss him. (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, Nov 9, 19:51:58
- But again I don't think criticism aimed at Wes was actually at Wes (NCFC) - lovely old job, Nov 9, 19:56:37
- Look at the managers since I have been at the club ;) (NCFC) - hoolahan, Nov 9, 19:59:02
- swivel on it prima dona (n/m) (NCFC) - Upperjarroldmiddle, Nov 9, 21:31:43
- Look at the managers since I have been at the club ;) (NCFC) - hoolahan, Nov 9, 19:59:02
- I miss you too (n/m) (NCFC) - hoolahan, Nov 9, 19:55:59
- But again I don't think criticism aimed at Wes was actually at Wes (NCFC) - lovely old job, Nov 9, 19:56:37
- Agree with tge Surman decision, we still lack a midfielder with some real vision (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Nov 9, 19:49:21
- Surman hadn't played for us for years (NCFC) - Charles21, Nov 9, 19:55:54
- yes in fairness I saw Surman v Wolves and Crawley and he was playing (NCFC) - lovely old job, Nov 9, 19:57:40
- well, since Hughton became manager, quite a few players 'didn't want to be here' anymore (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 9, 20:03:04
- yes in fairness I saw Surman v Wolves and Crawley and he was playing (NCFC) - lovely old job, Nov 9, 19:57:40
- Surman hadn't played for us for years (NCFC) - Charles21, Nov 9, 19:55:54
- Surman played at Wolves and looked lightweight in centre mid. (n/m) (NCFC) - trianglepatch, Nov 9, 20:25:59
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.