Same here...
Snod was a slow winger (but he did score some goals)... RVW was a striker that didn't score much or even do much. Fer was a lazy looking midfielder.
Posted By: Larry Hagman on September 14th 2014 at 22:56:39
Message Thread
- RE Fer - I wasn't at all bothered that the was sold (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Sep 14, 22:43:56
- I wasn't bothered he was sold or Snodgrass or that RVW left (NCFC) - norway, Sep 14, 22:47:11
- Same here... (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Sep 14, 22:56:39
- I felt that when Snodgrass played we lacked width ,which I don't think help RVW (n/m) (NCFC) - oh huckerby, Sep 14, 23:07:16
- True cos Snod didn't stretch defendfers much to crate space for RVW but (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Sep 14, 23:16:55
- Bassong next... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 14, 23:47:20
- True cos Snod didn't stretch defendfers much to crate space for RVW but (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Sep 14, 23:16:55
- I felt that when Snodgrass played we lacked width ,which I don't think help RVW (n/m) (NCFC) - oh huckerby, Sep 14, 23:07:16
- Same here... (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Sep 14, 22:56:39
- I wasn't bothered he was sold or Snodgrass or that RVW left (NCFC) - norway, Sep 14, 22:47:11
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.