Tettey much more valuable to the team IMO
Posted By: RochdaleCanary on September 1st 2014 at 15:31:54
Message Thread
- Nothing on Hooper, most important player for us to keep hold of IMO! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Sep 1, 14:58:16
- Tettey much more valuable to the team IMO (n/m) (NCFC) - RochdaleCanary, Sep 1, 15:31:54
- yep. Hooper's done nothing for us yet, and may never do even if he stays (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Sep 1, 15:41:02
- well there's this (NCFC) - Dave in France, Sep 1, 15:07:29
- As the 'cutoff hurtles closer' (NCFC) - King, Sep 1, 15:13:55
- If Hooper goes, Defoe would be super in this league (n/m) (NCFC) - Hendrikos, Sep 1, 15:05:35
- 90k a week, two year deal (is there a transfer fee?) (NCFC) - raretek, Sep 1, 15:45:04
- Wants 90k a week (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 1, 15:23:55
- is this actually true. (NCFC) - raretek, Sep 1, 15:34:00
- just found the article - crazy money (NCFC) - raretek, Sep 1, 15:42:43
- A 1 year loan, it wouldn't even be a year September to June (10 months) (NCFC) - Hendrikos, Sep 1, 15:48:05
- yes I think so, I did the math on a two year deal (missed the loan bit) and thought (NCFC) - raretek, Sep 1, 15:56:25
- A 1 year loan, it wouldn't even be a year September to June (10 months) (NCFC) - Hendrikos, Sep 1, 15:48:05
- just found the article - crazy money (NCFC) - raretek, Sep 1, 15:42:43
- Which is why even Koo Pee Arr are not going ahead with it (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Sep 1, 15:24:11
- is this actually true. (NCFC) - raretek, Sep 1, 15:34:00
- Turner for me, a rock in defence at this level (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Sep 1, 15:04:48
- I'd say Ruddy was but I agree Hoops needs to stay too (n/m) (NCFC) - Jumbo1, Sep 1, 14:59:24
- Tettey much more valuable to the team IMO (n/m) (NCFC) - RochdaleCanary, Sep 1, 15:31:54
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.