That is a massive and frankly libellous generalisation - Wrath of the Barclay

That is a massive and frankly libellous generalisation

There is absolutely not one shred of evidence of any corporate cover up of abuse at the BBC. Not a shred.

Posted By: norway on August 28th 2014 at 18:13:57

Message Thread

this shaun wright chap seems a bit of a wrongun letting all that (General Chat) - Tony Martin, Aug 28, 16:12:59
- He was asked on the locals news if he thought he should take responsibility (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Aug 28, 16:28:43
  - He wasn't the Head of Children's Services (General Chat) - norway, Aug 28, 18:11:34
    - Ha. That's good detail, thank you. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Aug 28, 23:22:45
  - What I want to know is how the fuck did Labour come to nominate him for the PCC role? (n/m) (General Chat) - King, Aug 28, 16:35:04
    - And *that* is a most pertinent question (General Chat) - norway, Aug 28, 18:51:06
  - Reminds me of the police chief at the centre of giving Ian Huntly the reference (General Chat) - pants, Aug 28, 16:31:34
    - Something that seems to be growing today (General Chat) - emmaroyds, Aug 28, 16:37:09
      - Well the bbc have swept abuse under the carpet for decades (General Chat) - pants, Aug 28, 16:41:26
        
        That is a massive and frankly libellous generalisation (General Chat) - norway, Aug 28, 18:13:57
- Chain of command. (General Chat) - pants, Aug 28, 16:25:27
  - the police too! "losing" items of evidence after taking them in (n/m) (General Chat) - Tony Martin, Aug 28, 16:34:25
    - Yeah lost evidence = person in charge at the time can't be held to account (General Chat) - pants, Aug 28, 16:39:41
      - So are you blaming the police here or the council? (General Chat) - norway, Aug 28, 18:15:37

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.