It is a long way down.
And "anti-football" isn't really true, even 4 years ago, any more than the majority of teams. It's a bit harsh. It was an obvious tactic, but it didn't work anyway.
Posted By: APB on June 29th 2014 at 20:28:38
Message Thread
- Anti football? Really? In 2010 perhaps. (n/m) (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Jun 29, 20:01:18
- nbttt (n/m) (Other Football) - pants, Jun 29, 20:13:09
- Too deep in the convo to nkatb on mobile site (n/m) (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Jun 29, 20:22:06
- ? (n/m) (Other Football) - Huge Small, Jun 29, 20:12:44
- One game in 2010 too. (Other Football) - norway, Jun 29, 20:10:08
- van bommel was fairly dirty throughout to be fair (n/m) (Other Football) - earlydoors, Jun 29, 20:16:51
- But not really different to most teams with an enforcer (Other Football) - norway, Jun 29, 20:22:36
- Yeah 2010 they were pretty nasty (n/m) (Other Football) - Steve in Holland, Jun 29, 20:21:32
- They always have been quite dirty and cynical, don't you think? (Other Football) - Huge Small, Jun 29, 20:24:42
- Maybe that's it (Other Football) - norway, Jun 29, 20:26:30
- Perhaps I didn't really notice! (Other Football) - norway, Jun 29, 20:24:13
- So you made a statement about one game without actually having idea what you were talking (Other Football) - pants, Jun 29, 21:19:33
- They always have been quite dirty and cynical, don't you think? (Other Football) - Huge Small, Jun 29, 20:24:42
- van bommel was fairly dirty throughout to be fair (n/m) (Other Football) - earlydoors, Jun 29, 20:16:51
- nbttt (n/m) (Other Football) - pants, Jun 29, 20:13:09
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.