Nothing to do with that. This whole exercise

Is a smokescreen to detract from their massive f**k up last season. That does not mean it won't work though.

Hughton did not mess up because he had too much responsibility. He was just a poor manager with big limitations.

Posted By: Jim on June 2nd 2014 at 18:41:27

Message Thread

FFS give the board a bit of credit.....They found that putting so much responsibility in (NCFC) - MaxsHandler, Jun 2, 18:20:27
- Nothing to do with that. This whole exercise (NCFC) - Jim, Jun 2, 18:41:27
  - vimto (n/m) (NCFC) - bobble, Jun 2, 21:00:50
  - Precisely my thoughts (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 2, 19:06:12
  - Perhaps he had too much on his plate, but not able to accept he was getting it wrong? (n/m) (NCFC) - MaxsHandler, Jun 2, 18:47:06
- I just hope that Chief Holt, Chief Royle, Chief Technical Director and Chief Recruitment (NCFC) - jAC, Jun 2, 18:29:20
  - If you read closely Adams job will be to get results from the First Team, not run the lot. (n/m) (NCFC) - MaxsHandler, Jun 2, 18:36:33
    - aye, I was being a bit sarcastic following the debates below (n/m) (NCFC) - jAC, Jun 2, 18:37:46
  - VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 2, 18:30:23
    - not to mention chief robson, chief personal assistant, chief groundsman, (NCFC) - jAC, Jun 2, 18:31:42
- Not really in favour of Adams appointment... (NCFC) - loz, Jun 2, 18:24:24
- Their decision to appoint someone they didn't want in January (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jun 2, 18:21:17
  - They explained why manager was winning ... (NCFC) - loz, Jun 2, 18:23:25

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.