Would have preferred Hughton to prove you right, but we were 5 points above the relly

and they shat their pants

Now they've gone one better and given the job to someone with no experience

Posted By: pants on May 22nd 2014 at 23:28:38

Message Thread

Well I haven't posted for ages (NCFC) - BillySteele, May 22, 23:26:38
- was Lambert nice? definitely not assaciated with the club (n/m) (NCFC) - robbieroberts, May 23, 06:30:47
- ambition was great this year. Signing Ricky, Fer etc (NCFC) - thirsty work, May 22, 23:37:35
  - Wtf last seasons gone now ,but don't compound it with his sort of appointment (n/m) (NCFC) - Mickdundee, May 22, 23:48:40
- Maybe, just maybe he's been employed because he's the best man for the job! What is it (NCFC) - Chopper, May 22, 23:35:05
  - There is absolutely no way after watching those five games (NCFC) - Mickdundee, May 23, 00:12:03
  - I was disappointed to begin with but warming to to Adams (NCFC) - Fozzybear, May 22, 23:42:56
  - Maybe a play off finish, championship title, league cup final. (NCFC) - phrankin, May 22, 23:37:05
- rioch & roeder were neither nice (NCFC) - Henclrikus, May 22, 23:33:43
  - Roeder saved us from relegation in his first season I believe (NCFC) - phrankin, May 22, 23:35:42
    - I am not arguing with their records (NCFC) - Henclrikus, May 22, 23:39:02
- Potd. (n/m) (NCFC) - bobble, May 22, 23:31:04
- Difficult to disagree with any of that (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, May 22, 23:30:22
  - I would say this was a bloody brave decision. (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 22, 23:36:18
    - Who was the second one? (n/m) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, May 22, 23:37:12
      - Lambert and Hughton were both good and successful appointments. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 22, 23:38:03
        
        Hughton? we did get relegated and have 2 seasons of mind blowingly shit football. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, May 22, 23:43:07
        
        So, by default then, all fans are know-nothing blowhards as well then (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 22, 23:45:18
        
        very fair point. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, May 22, 23:46:38
        
        Hughton (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, May 22, 23:41:51
        
        The failure was not recognising his time had come, not appointing him. (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 22, 23:43:34
        
        So being a popular appointment automatically makes you a success? (n/m) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, May 22, 23:47:07
        
        Depends what you consider success really (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, May 22, 23:58:42
        
        He did well, for a time. A season. Got over the difficult post-Lambert period. (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 22, 23:49:44
- Oh well. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 22, 23:29:30
  - *kecks down, arse waving defiance* (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 22, 23:31:40
    - It's the only response I could muster, tbf. I'm tired... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 22, 23:33:36
- Would have preferred Hughton to prove you right, but we were 5 points above the relly (NCFC) - pants, May 22, 23:28:38
  - I would rather have kept Hughton than this at least players knew him and he had an appeal, (NCFC) - lovely old job, May 22, 23:32:06
    - Agree with that (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, May 22, 23:36:13
  - they shat their pants because of out final 5 fixtures (NCFC) - phrankin, May 22, 23:31:59

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.