or we could get relegated again. I think most people's complaint is
at this stage in our development, are we at the point where we have to make a complete gamble of an appointment?
As for Adams, I agree I hope he does really well. But I do not believe this was a gamble the board had to make at this stage.
Posted By: phrankin on May 22nd 2014 at 21:36:15
Message Thread
- IMHO (NCFC) - trianglepatch, May 22, 21:33:09
- Sorry, but I have no confidence in this Board to aspire (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, May 22, 21:38:42
- or we could get relegated again. I think most people's complaint is (NCFC) - phrankin, May 22, 21:36:15
- Vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - Mickdundee, May 22, 21:47:00
- Agree with all of that (n/m) (NCFC) - trianglepatch, May 22, 21:40:38
- Yeah that's about it...we didn't need to take a gamble (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, May 22, 21:37:38
- Don't you dare come in here and try to make us see sense! (n/m) (NCFC) - BINMEN8R, May 22, 21:35:10
- I would have been slightly happier with Malky. (NCFC) - trafford_canary, May 22, 21:34:51
- Me too but as above he appears to have been choice #1 but no terms agreed (n/m) (NCFC) - trianglepatch, May 22, 21:42:42
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.