Too personal
I usually only read wotb. Never posted before. And it troubles me how personal it gets. You've caused me to register so I can say something.
James Nursey has some utterly idiotic views about Chris Hughton - they're completely detached from reality. But they are his honest views.
He's not a c**t. He's a mate of mine and he's an absolutely lovely guy, who might be hurt to read what you think.
Try to keep it friendly. There's no harm in being nice.
Posted By: Yellbourne on May 12th 2014 at 14:39:24
Message Thread
- Is James Nursey a troll? (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, May 11, 17:43:48
- What does that even mean? (n/m) (NCFC) - Upperjarroldmiddle, May 11, 17:50:05
- it means (NCFC) - Charles21, May 11, 17:51:04
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, May 11, 18:04:23
- it means (NCFC) - Charles21, May 11, 17:51:04
- He's a cunt if that helps (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, May 11, 17:45:20
- Too personal (NCFC) - Yellbourne, May 12, 14:39:24
- vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - AllezLesJaunes, May 11, 17:53:21
- Don't tell me... HUghton would have kept us up or some other nonsense (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 11, 17:47:26
- It's unlikely, but possible. Doesn't matter though anyway. (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, May 11, 17:53:27
- appears to be suggesting that (n/m) (NCFC) - Charles21, May 11, 17:48:25
- Well, in all honesty, he can't have done much worse than Adams managed (NCFC) - phrankin, May 11, 17:50:39
- so what? (NCFC) - Charles21, May 11, 17:51:32
- You don't know that. Like your fact post below (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 11, 17:52:43
- good point (NCFC) - Charles21, May 11, 17:54:06
- Down even with a win v Fulham though (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, May 11, 17:53:34
- Can't really say what would have happened now. He wasn't here to do it (NCFC) - pants, May 11, 17:56:48
- Indeed (NCFC) - duke of york, May 11, 17:59:45
- the odds suggest he wouldn't have got us enough points (NCFC) - Charles21, May 11, 17:58:48
- we were odds against going down when he was sacked (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, May 11, 18:01:48
- BUt we all knew we were shafted. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 11, 18:18:42
- we were odds against going down when he was sacked (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, May 11, 18:01:48
- Why would we have beaton Fulham under Hughton anyway? (NCFC) - phrankin, May 11, 17:55:38
- Can't really say what would have happened now. He wasn't here to do it (NCFC) - pants, May 11, 17:56:48
- lol (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, May 11, 17:53:21
- You don't know that. Like your fact post below (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, May 11, 17:52:43
- so what? (NCFC) - Charles21, May 11, 17:51:32
- Well, in all honesty, he can't have done much worse than Adams managed (NCFC) - phrankin, May 11, 17:50:39
- Depends on your definition of troll (NCFC) - norway, May 11, 17:47:01
- Troll;-) (n/m) (NCFC) - AllezLesJaunes, May 11, 17:55:24
- What does that even mean? (n/m) (NCFC) - Upperjarroldmiddle, May 11, 17:50:05
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.