What I am getting from the statement is...........
the board was very divided on the big issues of when to sack hoots and should we give him money in the Jan transfer window.
Posted By: usacanary on May 12th 2014 at 00:43:27
Message Thread
- Statement reads like they gave Hughton funds in January but he didn't spend (NCFC) - Brandonio, May 12, 00:22:02
- My understanding is (NCFC) - XXL16, May 12, 03:51:40
- What I am getting from the statement is........... (NCFC) - usacanary, May 12, 00:43:27
- Statement reads like "not our fault guv. It's the fault of the guy we left in charge til (NCFC) - thebigfeller, May 12, 00:26:57
- I read it as "We backed Chris in the summer, but failed to see any improvements (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, May 12, 00:26:34
- If so, they should have sacked him before January. If so, the situation is even more their (NCFC) - thebigfeller, May 12, 00:27:48
- Or they had the view that it was Chris's mess and he'd better get us out of it (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, May 12, 00:29:41
- sounds like mcnally is passing the buck (NCFC) - pab, May 12, 08:36:59
- You either back a manager or you sack them. You can't do neither and live to tell the tale (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, May 12, 00:36:19
- Or they had the view that it was Chris's mess and he'd better get us out of it (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, May 12, 00:29:41
- If so, they should have sacked him before January. If so, the situation is even more their (NCFC) - thebigfeller, May 12, 00:27:48
- Was said we were close to getting a number 10 from a big club (NCFC) - hoolahan, May 12, 00:24:05
- Rodwell but Man City didn't get player they wanted (n/m) (NCFC) - trt354, May 12, 07:44:10
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.