Statement reads like they gave Hughton funds in January but he didn't spend
anyone else think that?
Posted By: Brandonio on May 12th 2014 at 00:22:02
Message Thread
- Statement reads like they gave Hughton funds in January but he didn't spend (NCFC) - Brandonio, May 12, 00:22:02
- My understanding is (NCFC) - XXL16, May 12, 03:51:40
- What I am getting from the statement is........... (NCFC) - usacanary, May 12, 00:43:27
- Statement reads like "not our fault guv. It's the fault of the guy we left in charge til (NCFC) - thebigfeller, May 12, 00:26:57
- I read it as "We backed Chris in the summer, but failed to see any improvements (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, May 12, 00:26:34
- If so, they should have sacked him before January. If so, the situation is even more their (NCFC) - thebigfeller, May 12, 00:27:48
- Or they had the view that it was Chris's mess and he'd better get us out of it (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, May 12, 00:29:41
- sounds like mcnally is passing the buck (NCFC) - pab, May 12, 08:36:59
- You either back a manager or you sack them. You can't do neither and live to tell the tale (n/m) (NCFC) - thebigfeller, May 12, 00:36:19
- Or they had the view that it was Chris's mess and he'd better get us out of it (NCFC) - roedtonowhere, May 12, 00:29:41
- If so, they should have sacked him before January. If so, the situation is even more their (NCFC) - thebigfeller, May 12, 00:27:48
- Was said we were close to getting a number 10 from a big club (NCFC) - hoolahan, May 12, 00:24:05
- Rodwell but Man City didn't get player they wanted (n/m) (NCFC) - trt354, May 12, 07:44:10
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.