exactly

so does that mean we really won't sell him or does it mean we will accept a lower price and look completely stupid having let go our prize asset, who would be worth a lot more if we hadn't destroyed him with our dull 'football'?

Posted By: ede on December 9th 2005 at 09:25:09

Message Thread

On Ashton's price tag (NCFC) - ede, Dec 9, 09:08:35
- no team will pay ?9m for Ashton, not even Chelski. (NCFC) - ingi, Dec 9, 09:21:47
  - exactly (NCFC) - ede, Dec 9, 09:25:09
- He would go out & use the money on 2 hard working strikers, 3 hard working central mids (NCFC) - lovely old job, Dec 9, 09:11:25
  - we will probably get more journeymen if we let Worthy sign more players (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Dec 9, 09:25:38
    - I would not allow him to spend another penny. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Dec 9, 09:28:06
  - and definitely not a right winger (NCFC) - ede, Dec 9, 09:19:16
    - well lets face it under him we have not hard a proper right winger since Adrian Forbes (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Dec 9, 09:20:53
      - who he didn't even sign (NCFC) - ede, Dec 9, 09:22:03
  - on the plus side it looks like a bidding war could push the price up! (n/m) (NCFC) - NCFC4life, Dec 9, 09:15:07

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.